U.S. foreign policy and media coverage
The U.S. foreign policy initiatives played out in Kosovo and Yugoslavia
is a good case in studying old alliances based upon European supremacy
and African (3rd World ) domination. It is also a good study in how the
white media plays into this scenario. Since the Congress of Berlin when
Europe divided up the African world and allowed Russia to be the spokesman
for the Slavs, decisions of the Great Britain and then the U.S. after World
War II have been made on the interest of its World War II allies and their
world wide interest of exploitation. The colonial areas have only been
considered in light of these European alliances. These alliances have been
based on a strong free market backed up by a strong military alliance which
is NATO, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Regional stability is
the key for continual world wide domination. The question during the cold
war was which camp was going to rule, the East or the West. Today, the
U.S. is the world power and they are in Europe for one reason to continue
from the British in its quest for world wide domination and exploitation.
Enter the Balkan conflict. Ever since the Battle of Kosovo in 1389 on
the field of Blackbirds captured in Uros Predic's 'The Maiden of Kosovo'
when the Turks (Ottoman) gained control over the province and extended
Islam over the area, the Orthodox Christians, the Greeks, and finally the
Hapsburg tried to control and stabilize the area. Hence, when it didn't
work, we have the incident that provoked World War I, its continuation
in World War II, the Cold War, and now the genocide that's taking place
in Kosovo with the so-called Ethnic-Albanians, 90% Muslims. Like the battle
Tours and Charles Martel, the question then and now is will Europe be dominated
by Christianity and western institutions or Islam?
This stability has been shaken by Bosnian instability and genocide being
carried out principally by Slobodan Milosevic, in Kosovo. It must be said
that he is not the only actor in this human tragedy, but the point is he
must be put in his place for destabilizing southeast Europe and threatening
the fragile alliance between the Italians, Turks, Greeks, and Russians.
This is one of the major reasons for the massive power, to let the European
and all of the 3rd world countries that they face being bombed into oblivion
if they defy Europe led by the U.S.
What does this mean for Africa? Very simply, when there is destabilization
of Africa, it is in the interest of the European and American powers to
exploit these newly independent countries for its natural wealth and resources.
Therefore you have the British, French, Dutch, U.S. Scrambling for the
resources as they promote wars in Liberia, Sierra Leone, Congo, Sudan,
Chad, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Angola, Algeria, to name a few. Therefore the
politics of destabilization in Africa must be resisted for the future of
Africa and its people throughout the diaspora. For our destiny is tied
with theirs, not Europe and its predatory approach to humanity.
What does this mean for the White press? For most of the managed white
press, the truth of African genocide and European complicity will not be
told. The many wars that have plagued the continent has not been told,
because Africa and African people are not important to Europe or the U.S.
and its massive media. We must act to protect Africa and African people
wherever they are. The role of the Black press must to agitate, agitate
and be the messenger of a new African reformation. The white world wide
press knows it role and they are playing it well. If you have been moved
by the great inhumanity seen on our television sets and the testimonials
by our politicians like U.S. Senators Durbin and Fitzgerald, just what
do you think happened to 150 million Africans who died from the Middle
Passage and chattel slavery?