Front PageOctober 30, 2000

NNPA Special Report (Week 3 of 3):

R
Robert Moore
Standard Newspapers
6 min read · 1136 words

In the summer of 1990, civil rights and

voting rights activists from across the South met in Waveland, Mississippi

to discuss what they saw as a growing threat to minority participation

in electoral politics: The high cost of running for office.

Speaking at the conference, Dr. Gwen Patton,

a former leader of the Student Non-violent Coordinating Committee from

Alabama, made the link between campaign finance reform and voting rights.

"We have fought and died for the right

to vote. But what good is the right to vote if we don’t have candidates

to vote for?" she asked.

Following the conference, activists developed

a legal memorandum that was sent to law professors, attorneys, and law

students. The goal of the memo was to find a legal way to challenge the

private funding of elections as a violation of voting rights.

Over a decade later, the movement among

voting rights activists to reform the campaign finance system has borne

fruit. A half-dozen lawsuits across the county have been filed challenging

the impact that money in politics has on minority communities.

Although most of the suits have been dismissed,

activists are encouraged by the groundswell of support from civil rights

groups and the Black community for reforms. These activists see their movement

as a continuation of the fight to outlaw other forms of political injustice,

such as the poll taxes and the discriminatory all-White nomination processes

they fought in the 1960’s.

"We’re redefining campaign finance reform

as a civil rights issue," said Stephanie Wilson, executive director of

the Fannie Lou Hamer Project, a coalition of groups challenging the so-called

"wealth primary." "Big money in politics directly impacts communities of

color by restricting our political and social participation."

Race and Reform

Until recently, campaign finance reform

was thought of as a "White" issue, said Spencer Overton, a law professor

at the University of California-Davis, who has written extensively on campaign

finance and civil rights.

Overton said the perception exists because

most groups working on the issue have done little to reach out to African-Americans.

"The few outreach efforts have been perceived

as strategic attempts to co-opt Black support for specific campaign reform

proposals, without any real effort to understand the particular problems

that the existing campaign finance systems creates in Black communities,"

Overton said.

Yet, campaign finance reform should be

something that Blacks should worry about and be a part of, he added. 

The lack of attention to gun control, health care, and other issues impacting

the Black community can be directly attributed to the lack of reform in

the campaign finance system, Overton said.

In July, to remedy the small number of

African-Americans involved in the campaign reform movement, activists formed

the Fannie Lou Hamer Project. Based in Atlanta, Georgia, the project is

a coalition of civil rights and community-based organizations whose mission

is to educate African-Americans about the role of big money in politics

and how it impacts communities of color.

"Lots of people out there talk about voter

education, but who are we voting for and how does it help or hurt our communities,"

said Stephanie Wilson, executive director of the Project.

Gwen Patton, one of the founders of the

Project, said the fight against record amounts of money in the political

process is an extension of the battle for voting rights Blacks fought for

in the early 1950's and 60's. "The voting rights struggle was not one simply

of passive participation by voting it-included in its intent, for those

who were locked out, to have an opportunity for active participation,"

Patton said.

"One of the foremost tenets in the 1965

Voting Rights Act was to remove all barriers so that grassroots people

themselves could run for office."

Modern Day Poll Tax

The Fannie Low Hamer Project has partnered

with campaign finance reform groups such as Public Campaign and the Center

for Responsive Politics. The group has also set up booths and workshops

on campaign finance reform at both the Republican and the Democratic national

conventions, Wilson said.

The Project helped the NAACP draft a resolution

supporting public financing of elections, instead of continuing to let

candidates be financed by private interests. Perhaps the most promising

tools the group sees in its fight against the campaign finance system are

lawsuits challenging the system as discriminatory.

The lawsuits, said John Bonifaz, executive

director of the National Voting Rights Institute in Boston and a founder

of the Fannie Lou Hamer Project, said the campaign finance system of today

has replaced the poll tax of the past as the newest barrier to political

inclusion.

"It’s an issue not just faced by minority

candidates," Bonifaz said. "But race certainly compounds the problem. 

There is no question that people of color are significantly handicapped

by this system more than their White counterparts. Lawsuits challenging

the so-called wealth barrier have been filed in Georgia, New York, and

North Carolina. Most of the lawsuits have been thrown out by judges who

say the campaign finance system does not preclude people of color from

voting."

But Bonifaz said the judges have misread

case law on the subject. For example, he said, in a 1953 case before the

U.S. Supreme Court, the justices ruled that an all-White political organization

in Texas which was only open to White voters and had nominated candidates

to run for the Democratic Party primary, limited Black participation even

though it did not keep them from voting.

The High Court ruled that the group had

become "part of the machinery for choosing officials and required constitutional

scrutiny." The Court then struck down the group's nominating process, finding

that it barred Blacks from an "elective process that determines who shall

rule and govern."

Bonifaz said groups involved in the Fannie

Lou Hamer Project will continue to pursue the lawsuits, noting that many

of the lawsuits filed by civil rights activist in the 50's and 60's were

originally dismissed. A lawsuit filed in North Carolina may hold more promise,

Bonifaz said, since the state constitution specifically prohibits wealth

barriers to electoral involvement.

"It’s similar to the fight over equal funding

in education," Bonifaz said. " Although the Supreme Court said that education

is not a constitutional right, many states’ constitutions do guarantee

equal education. The same thing applies to wealth as a barrier to elective

office."

Jennifer Wilson, director of the Fannie

Lou Hamer Project, said the movement to reform the campaign finance systems

is picking up steam in communities of color.

"People are starting to see that it’s not

about skill or qualification, but money," she said. "Any time you have

a situation like that the community is disadvantaged and people begin to

see that when you start to show how this ties in to other issues in the

community."

The series was made possible by funding

from the J. Roderick MacArthur Foundation.

Tags:Front PageArchive2000
Share:

Related Articles